• Apollo Learn
  • Posts
  • The Evolution of Bitcoin Hardware Wallets: A Journey Through Time

The Evolution of Bitcoin Hardware Wallets: A Journey Through Time

Exploring Hardware Wallet Evolution: Security, User Experience, and the evolution of Bitcoin-Only

Before Hardware Wallets

In February 2009, the first Bitcoin wallet, called Bitcoin-Qt, was created by Satoshi Nakamoto. This wallet made you download the entire history of Bitcoin, which took longer as more and more transactions were added. It stored your Bitcoin keys in a file on your computer. This wasn't perfect because if you lost this file, you could lose your Bitcoin (and many did).

The Risk with Online Wallets

Another issue is that keeping Bitcoin on a computer that's connected to the internet (called a 'hot wallet') just isn’t safe enough because hackers could break in and steal your Bitcoin keys. So, to make things more secure, companies started making hardware wallets.

The Early Innovators: Trezor and Ledger

In 2014, Trezor from the Czech Republic introduced the Trezor One – the first real-deal Bitcoin hardware wallet. Not long after, Ledger, a French company, released its Ledger Nano. 

Evolution of Security Features in Hardware Wallets

Since their inception, hardware wallets have significantly evolved, especially in terms of security and user experience. Early models like the Trezor One and Ledger Nano S provided a secure, offline environment for storing private keys. Despite their innovation, they had drawbacks. Some important lessons needed to be learned along the way.

Enhancing Security with Display Screens

A pivotal feature that sets apart modern hardware wallets from earlier models like the original Ledger Nano and Bitbox01 is the inclusion of display screens. This addition isn't just a matter of convenience; it's a significant leap in security.

The display screen on a hardware wallet plays a crucial role in safeguarding transactions. It allows users to visually verify essential details of a transaction, such as the recipient's address and the amount of cryptocurrency being sent. This visual confirmation is a vital security measure. Without a display, users are vulnerable to a specific type of attack where a hacker infiltrates the computer and alters the transaction details displayed on the screen, potentially redirecting funds to a wrong address.

By requiring the transaction details to be confirmed on the hardware wallet's display, this risk is substantially mitigated. When the user sees that the address on the wallet’s screen matches the one on their computer, they can be confident that the transaction is legitimate. 

Bitbox01 (No Display)

Bitbox02 (With display)

Multi-Signature Support: A Leap in Security

A significant advancement in wallet security is the introduction of multi-signature support, requiring multiple parties to approve a transaction. This means even if one key is compromised, your assets remain secure, as additional keys are needed to complete any transaction.

This feature, found in models like the Trezor Model T and Ledger Nano X, adds a robust layer of protection against unauthorized access.

Integrating Secure Elements for Enhanced Protection

Another key development is the integration of secure elements, specialized chips that protect crucial data from tampering and physical threats. The Ledger Nano X and Coldcard wallets are notable examples utilizing these elements for increased security.

User Experience: From Complex to Intuitive

Modern hardware wallets have greatly improved in user experience, featuring more user-friendly interfaces that simplify setup, backup, and recovery processes. Innovations like the touchscreen on the Trezor Model T and Bluetooth (like on the Ledger Nano X).

Emergence of Bitcoin-Only Wallets

In recent years, there’s been a push for Bitcoin-only hardware wallets. The Trezor wallets and Ledger wallets have expanded their compatibility beyond Bitcoin to the broader crypto market to accommodate various tokens, and some have argued they may inadvertently expose users to a broader attack surface.

When hardware wallets support multiple cryptocurrencies, they need to accommodate the unique requirements and protocols of each. This often involves implementing additional code or integrating third-party libraries, which may not have the same level of security scrutiny as the core wallet code. As the complexity of wallet software increases, so does the likelihood of undiscovered vulnerabilities that attackers could exploit.

In response, companies like Blockstream, Bitbox and Coinkite have introduced Bitcoin-only hardware wallets, such as Jade the Bitbox02 Wallet and the ColdCard MK4, respectively.

Understanding Bitcoin Ownership

As of January 2024, there are over 44 million addresses with a non-zero balance, up from 27 million at the start of the decade. While this doesn't perfectly represent the number of users, as many have multiple addresses or store Bitcoin on exchanges or in derivatives like ETFs, it does indicate the number of people self-custodying Bitcoin, estimated at around 10 million.


Bitcoin hardware wallets have significantly evolved since the early 2010s. Trezor and Ledger initially set the standard and later on, Bitcoin-only wallets have emerged to offer best in class security for a Bitcoin hardware wallet set up.

The increasing number of Bitcoin investors who self-custody their Bitcoin has provided opportunities for companies to create niche hardware devices that differentiate themselves based on price, user experience and security.

These wallets continue to evolve, reflecting the changing needs and concerns of the Bitcoin community. From the pioneering days of the Trezor to today's models, hardware wallets are indispensable in safely managing Bitcoin.

‍Exploring Hardware Wallet Evolution: Security, User Experience, and the evolution of Bitcoin-Only